infraCAP 2027

Closed-Door Institutional Roundtable

PARK HYATT VIENNA • March 17

A Curated Gathering of Europe’s Infrastructure Capital Allocators and Investment Managers

Institutional Perspectives.
Unfiltered Insights.

Infrastructure investment decisions are made within highly specialised segments of the market. Capital allocators, equity managers and debt providers each operate within distinct mandates, incentives, and risk frameworks. While this specialisation drives expertise and execution, it can also result in fragmented perspectives on investment theses, capital structures, valuation and pricing dynamics, portfolio construction, and the drivers of long-term risk-adjusted returns.

This roundtable convenes senior leaders from across the infrastructure investment ecosystem for candid, peer-level dialogue among key market participants. Through a combination of cohort-based and cross-functional discussions, participants gain direct insight into the priorities, constraints, and decision-making frameworks that shape capital allocation, fund strategy, financing structures, and investment execution.

The programme is designed not to build consensus, but to broaden perspective. By testing assumptions, comparing approaches, and examining the market through multiple lenses, participants develop a more integrated understanding of risk, return, liquidity, and discipline in infrastructure markets, supporting more informed decision-making in an increasingly complex environment.

Bridging Perspectives Across the Infrastructure Capital Ecosystem

The infraCAP Roundtable brings together 30-35 senior leaders from across European infrastructure investment in a closed-door, invitation-only setting. The group is anchored by institutional allocators and leading equity and debt managers, with limited representation from selected developers and strategic partners.

Participants are active contributors throughout. Discussions alternate between expert cohort sessions and mixed-group roundtables, bringing together different market perspectives while maintaining a strong allocator voice and balanced discussion.

Key participant groups include:

— Institutional Allocators
— Infrastructure Equity Managers
— Infrastructure Debt Managers
— Selected Developers & Strategic Partners (limited)

Participants are carefully curated to ensure senior leadership with direct investment authority and alignment with long-term institutional mandates.

Participation is strictly by invitation only. Limited capacity.

Integrated Intelligence Sessions

*A preliminary agenda will be shared with all invited groups. Discussions are held under strict confidentiality, with no press, recording, or external attribution.

A full-day program designed for senior infrastructure investment leaders, combining interactive roundtables, plenary discussions, and strategic briefings, complemented by curated connections with peers across the infrastructure capital ecosystem. Discussions are structured around core themes shaping today’s infrastructure investment environment, from allocation strategy and valuation discipline to capital structuring, liquidity and exit dynamics, and portfolio risk management.

This framework is indicative. A detailed agenda will be refined in consultation with participants and facilitators. Participants contribute to shaping session priorities, while facilitators ensure discussions remain rigorous, relevant, and decision-oriented.

01. Allocation & Strategy

*Cohort Session

Allocating with Conviction: Strategy and Positioning

Infrastructure allocation decisions are increasingly shaped by competing priorities: yield, inflation protection, liquidity, and long-term growth. In parallel cohort sessions, allocators, equity managers, and debt managers each examine how they approach strategy and positioning in a more selective market, exploring where priorities and assumptions diverge and what that means for capital flowing into the asset class. Each group starts from its own mandate.

▶ Institutional Allocators

Allocators weigh infrastructure against other real assets and credit, balancing returns, inflation linkage and liquidity while deciding how much to commit, where, and with whom.

  • Where does infrastructure sit within the total portfolio?
  • How should equity and debt allocations be balanced?
  • What returns justify infrastructure’s illiquidity today?
  • How are manager selection criteria evolving?
  • Which strategies deserve more capital, and which less?
  • Direct, co-investment or fund: where is conviction highest?
  • Which sub-sectors are gaining favour, and which face scepticism?

▶ Infrastructure Equity Managers

Managers navigate fundraising, differentiation and strategy design in a competitive market, deciding where to focus, how to position, and what allocators now expect.

  • What differentiates a strategy in a crowded fundraising market?
  • What do allocators now demand from infrastructure managers?
  • Core, core-plus or value-add: where is the edge?
  • How are fund terms and fees evolving?
  • Is specialisation or diversification winning allocator support?
  • Which sectors are managers prioritising, and why?
  • Which return expectations are realistic from today’s entry levels?

▶ Infrastructure Equity Managers

Debt managers assess where infrastructure debt fits within allocator portfolios, and how pricing, structure and relative value compare against equity and other credit alternatives.

  • Where does infrastructure debt fit within allocator portfolios?
  • How does relative value compare with equity today?
  • Senior or junior: where is risk best compensated?
  • What do insurers and pensions require from debt strategies?
  • How is bank competition shaping pricing and structure?
  • Investment grade or sub-investment grade: where is the opportunity?
  • Where is debt opportunity strongest across infrastructure segments?

02. The New Infrastructure Investment Thesis

*Mixed Session

Redefining Infrastructure: Where Do We Draw the Line?

The boundaries of infrastructure are shifting. Newer segments and infrastructure-adjacent businesses now compete for capital alongside traditional assets, challenging long-held assumptions about what qualifies and how it should be underwritten. In this mixed roundtable, allocators, equity managers, and debt managers test where the line should sit, where their views diverge, and what a changing definition means for mandates, risk, and returns.

▶ All groups

Every group compares where it draws the boundary, how that shapes mandates, risk appetite and return expectations, and where views align or conflict.

  • Where should the boundary of infrastructure sit today?
  • What makes an asset genuinely infrastructure, not infrastructure-adjacent?
  • Where does infrastructure end and growth equity begin?
  • How should risk and return differ across the spectrum?
  • Are allocators and managers aligned on what qualifies?
  • Which segments are testing the definition most, and why?
  • Does the definition differ for equity and for debt?
  • How should mandates adapt as the definition evolves?

03. Capital Structuring, Pricing and Underwriting

*Cohort Session

Deploying with Discipline: Structuring, Pricing and Entry

Capital is being deployed into a market where competition, pricing and structuring are changing quickly. In parallel cohort sessions, allocators, equity managers, and debt managers each examine how they commit capital, from selecting entry points and structures to setting pricing and governance, and where discipline is being tested. Each group considers the decisions it faces and the trade-offs it accepts in today’s market.

▶ Institutional Allocators

Allocators examine how capital is committed through funds, co-investment and direct deals, scrutinising pricing, governance and risk appetite, and the discipline they expect from partners.

  • How rigorous should co-investment due diligence be?
  • What governance do allocators need on direct deals?
  • How much entry-price discipline should allocators expect from managers?
  • Which risks are allocators least willing to carry?
  • How should risk appetite differ between equity and debt?
  • Do fee and carry terms reward disciplined investing?
  • Which segments justify paying premium entry valuations?

▶ Infrastructure Equity Managers

Managers weigh entry pricing, competition and structuring in a crowded market, deciding where to be selective, how to underwrite demand, and how to create value.

  • How much should managers pay for quality assets?
  • Where is competition for assets most intense?
  • How are entry multiples holding up against higher rates?
  • How should construction and demand risk be underwritten?
  • What capital structures are working best today?
  • Where does genuine value creation come from now?
  • Which sectors still offer attractive entry points?

▶ Infrastructure Equity Managers

Debt managers focus on structuring and pricing across the capital stack, assessing protections and spreads, and how to hold discipline as competition intensifies.

  • How should construction risk be structured and priced?
  • Which covenants and protections matter most today?
  • Are spreads adequately compensating for long-dated risk?
  • How is lender competition affecting documentation standards?
  • How should refinancing and tail risk be assessed?
  • Which segments demand the most structural protection?
  • How do ratings and insurer requirements shape deal terms?

04. Capital Meets Project Reality

*Mixed Session

From Capital to Concrete: Who Carries the Risk?

Large amounts of capital are available, yet turning it into operating infrastructure remains difficult. In this mixed roundtable, allocators, equity managers, debt managers, and selected developer guests examine how development, construction, and demand risks are allocated, priced, and shared, and what must change for projects to become investable. The discussion tests where each party draws its limits and who ultimately bears the risk.

▶ All groups

Every group compares how risk is allocated between developers, investors and lenders, and where structures, regulation or project preparation must change, with developer guests contributing.

  • Why does capital remain hard to deploy into projects?
  • Who should bear construction and development risk?
  • Who should carry demand and offtake risk?
  • How do blended structures change who carries risk?
  • What makes a project truly investable for institutions?
  • Where do equity and debt investors disagree on risk?
  • Which segments face risks the market cannot yet absorb?
  • What must change in structures, regulation or project preparation?

05. Portfolio, Liquidity and Exits

*Cohort Session

The Long Hold: Liquidity, Exits and Portfolio Resilience

Infrastructure’s long holding periods are being tested as exits slow, valuations are debated, and liquidity needs grow. In parallel cohort sessions, allocators, equity managers, and debt managers each examine how portfolios are managed through the cycle, from liquidity planning and exit routes to valuation discipline and resilience, and how each group responds when capital stays invested longer than planned, and what that means for returns.

▶ Institutional Allocators

Allocators manage liquidity and portfolio balance over long horizons, weighing secondaries, evergreen structures and distribution timing against denominator effects and the need to recycle capital.

  • How should allocators plan for slower distributions?
  • What role should secondaries play in liquidity management?
  • Are evergreen structures a solution or a compromise?
  • How are denominator effects shaping commitment pacing?
  • How much do valuation marks reflect real exit prices?
  • When is a longer hold better than selling?
  • Which segments are proving most resilient through the cycle?

▶ Infrastructure Equity Managers

Managers confront longer holding periods, valuation gaps and exit uncertainty, deciding when to sell, extend or restructure, and how to maintain trust with allocators.

  • Which exit routes are open and which have closed?
  • How should valuation gaps with buyers be bridged?
  • When do continuation vehicles serve allocators well?
  • How long is too long to hold an asset?
  • How should managers communicate unrealised value to allocators?
  • What drives portfolio resilience once the asset is owned?
  • Which sectors are attracting buyers, and which are not?

3. Infrastructure Equity Managers

Debt managers focus on performance monitoring, refinancing and downside scenarios, assessing how long-dated loans behave through the cycle and how restructurings are handled.

  • How should refinancing risk be assessed at origination?
  • What early-warning signals matter most in monitoring?
  • How are restructurings handled differently from other credit?
  • What do downside scenarios look like for long loans?
  • How do recovery rates compare with other credit?
  • How should secondary sales of debt be approached?
  • Which segments carry the most refinancing pressure?

06: The Next Frontier

*Mixed Session

Beyond Consensus: Where Does Capital Go Next?

Infrastructure capital is moving toward new opportunities, and consensus on where it should go is far from settled. In this closing mixed roundtable, allocators, equity managers, and debt managers test their views on emerging segments, shifting mandates, and the conditions needed for new areas to become investable, and challenge each other on conviction, timing, and the next generation of infrastructure investment.

▶ All groups

Every group shares where it sees the next opportunities, what would change its mind, and how mandates, risk appetite and capital allocation must evolve.

  • Which emerging segments could become investable infrastructure?
  • Which are still too early or too risky?
  • How dependent on policy support is too dependent?
  • What would trigger your first commitment to a segment?
  • How should mandates evolve to capture new opportunities?
  • Where do allocators and managers disagree on timing?
  • Will equity or debt capital move first into new areas?
  • Which assumption will you revisit after today’s discussion?

Strategic Value & Outcomes

Participants leave the roundtable with greater conviction in their investment strategy and a broader understanding of how peers are navigating capital deployment, asset selection, and risk across evolving infrastructure markets.

This is a rare, off-the-record setting for candid exchange among senior investors and market participants, designed to broaden perspective, sharpen investment decision-making, and strengthen long-term relationships across the infrastructure investment community.

What You’ll Gain

— Insights into allocation, portfolio construction, and capital deployment
— Peer exchange with senior investors, fund managers, and asset owners
— Perspectives on valuation, underwriting, financing, and risk management
— A broader view of emerging opportunities and long-term market trends
— Trusted relationships built on discretion and shared expertise

Program FAQs

No invitation. Can we still participate?

We convene a limited number of curated groups for each edition, while remaining open to expressions of interest from qualified organizations. If you would like to be considered for participation, please submit your inquiry via our support page. Participation is by invitation only, and our team will review all submissions and follow up where appropriate.

What is the required level of preparation?

Preparation is intentionally light. Each session is guided by experienced facilitators to keep discussions focused and productive. In the lead-up to the program, we work with participants to capture priority topics and questions, which are reflected in the agenda where relevant. On site, all participants are active contributors and encouraged to raise the issues they consider most material.

What is the structure of the program?

The program begins at 8:00 AM with a networking breakfast, followed by the main program from 9:00 AM to 3:30 PM, including six core roundtable sessions (cohorts and mixed groups), where participants rotate across tables to ensure exposure to a range of perspectives and consistently fresh insights. 

These are complemented by mid-day and closing plenaries (group discussion/Q&A), rapid reporting segments and select presentations on topics of relevance, ensuring a well-paced format that combines depth, exchange, and connectivity. The agenda also features structured networking moments throughout the day, including coffee breaks, a working lunch, and a closing reception. 

Invited participants receive the full agenda in advance, along with a secure access link and password to complete their online registration.

Is more than one participant allowed?

Participation is typically limited to one delegate per organization. In select cases, additional participants may be considered if they contribute relevant expertise aligned with the cohort groups and add meaningful depth to the discussions. Alternatively, two participants may share attendance across the program (e.g. morning and afternoon sessions), provided they align with the same cohort group.

Are there speaker opportunities?

The program is primarily structured around moderated roundtable discussions. However, we reserve a limited number of short presentation slots (approximately 10 minutes) for partner organizations to share highly relevant insights with the audience.

If you would like to explore a speaking or presentation opportunity, please contact us via our contact page.

Can I moderate a session?

Yes, participants are welcome and encouraged to facilitate one of the core roundtable sessions (35 minutes). If you are interested, please indicate this in the registration form. Our team will coordinate with moderators on session topics and key questions in advance.

Sessions are conversational and discussion-led in format. Moderators are supported with guidance to ensure a structured flow, balanced participation, and a high-quality exchange among peers.

Registration

Registration is limited to one participant per group. The information provided in this form will be used solely for event registration and related communications.

*Cancellations made more than 60 days prior to the event are fully refundable. Cancellations between 30 and 60 days prior are eligible for a 50% refund. Cancellations within 30 days of the event are non-refundable. Delegate passes are transferable.